Be nice to geologists

Well, I have been taken to the woodshed by my many geologist friends for using the word “geologist” to describe those who use the Periodic Table to guide their expectations, which in turn are key to deciding whether or not a result is viewed as “extraordinary”, in the Sagan sense.

My bad. And to think of it, more correct for such folks would be the word “chemist”. After all, the Periodic Table is at the core of chemistry. Further, those whose work in geology departments centers on the Table might call themselves “geochemists”, to distinguish themselves from those whose work centers on hiking landscapes to plot strata.

Now, anyone who finds the string c-h-e-m-i-s-t somewhere in their CV does not a priori find it absurd to propose that an element below another element in the Table might substitute for an element above. Especially organic chemists. Indeed, the “halogen series” of compounds (fluorine replaced by chlorine replaced by bromine replaced by iodine) is a staple of physical organic chemistry; the changing reactivity of one set of compounds along that series is used to calibrate changing reactivity for many other sets.

This is even true for elements in the middle of the Table. People who base expectations using the Periodic Table (shall we call them X-chemists?) do not discard generally as absurd the notion that silicon might substitute for carbon in some contexts, or arsenic might substitute for phosphorus, with “trend-like” changes in behavior.

But Sagan’s aphorism (“extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”) was the focus of my comment, not the naming of fields. It is not easily applied, as “extraordinary” depends on context. If all that you know about chemistry is the Periodic Table, the claim of arsenate DNA might not strike you as requiring extraordinary evidence. Only if you know much more chemistry does this change.


  1. Jego rodzicami byli Richard i Kathie Wright.

  2. Slot games are one of the most popular gambling games
    in the sum up world, why ?. The slot robot was originally made as entertainment for bars
    or pubs in additional York. Players total coins and later tug the lever to spin the slot robot and the results that come out will determine what rewards the player
    gets from beer to cigar. The prize is distinct by the robot owner and there is no solution payment along with the machines.

    Then this was developed in accordance past the times,
    until finally gambling was acceptable in the associated States and many gambling houses or
    casinos made various types of slot games that existed
    until progressive in the tardy 20th century, several software companies made programs for the slot
    games we played today. This is upon an online gambling site.

    At gift there are more than hundreds of thousands of types of online slot games
    that exist throughout the world, made by thousands of gambling game software companies.
    However, there are several companies that are famous for the games
    they have developed that have fascinating graphics and sounds.
    under we will write a number of famous slot gambling
    software providers or developers, along next the most well-liked
    slot games from that slot provider.

Leave a Reply

  • About "A Tempting Science"

    Steven BennerSteven Benner discusses recent events in science and how they force us to think about how science is done. For information about Steven Benner’s career, research goals, and publications, please view his biosketch.

  • Life, the Universe...

    Look inside Life, the Universe, and the Scientific MethodLife, the Universe, and the Scientific Method discusses cross-disciplinary science to explain how scientists approach “big” questions, here, whether alien life might exist. With full color graphics and two dozen cartoons done by Jake Fuller, this is a must read for those interested in how science really works. As a limited time special offer for visiting our website, an autographed copy of the book can be purchased for a reduced price; visit for details.

We thank NASA and STScI for the image of the Milky Way.