Benner, S.A., Schulze-Makuch, D., Spacek, J., Abraham, C.
Astrobiology 26 (2) 148-153 (2026) PMID: 41468165, doi: 10.1177/15311074251404929
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data from the Viking Mars mission
were misinterpreted in 1976 as showing that martian soils contain no
organic molecules, and therefore no life, even though the three life
detection experiments delivered by Viking all reported life-positive
data under the terms of their experimental design. This mistake has been
propagated for a half century, including in textbooks and National
Aeronautics and Space Administration-endorsed documents, even though it
has been known since 2009 that the martian soils contained perchlorate,
perchlorate destroys organic materials in ways that might generate the
GC-MS results, and Curiosity in 2013 observed such processes in Gale
crater on Mars, as have other rovers since. Anomalies in the propagated
misinterpretation, including a contradiction between the “strong martian
soil oxidant” hypothesis and quantitative results in the carbon
assimilation experiment, were “explained away” in 1976, in some cases by
invoking results of experiments that had not yet been done. Today, a
scientific back-and-forth is long overdue to develop an understanding of
what Viking revealed about the possibility of life on the near surface
of Mars. Starting this back-and-forth here, we note how the Viking
results are compatible with a soil that contains bacterial autotrophs
that respire with stored oxygen on Mars (BARSOOM), a lifestyle adapted
to its environment, including sparse resources that drive dormancy,
scarce atmospheric oxygen, and a cold and briny fluid only
intermittently available, perhaps, when the water-ice fogs seen by
Viking indicate that the relative humidity exceeds 100%.